Sponsors



Main

September 20, 2007

Vivisection at Berkeley: Protest all life sciences!

Recently, a group of student-organized protesters picketed on-campus and outside the Helen Wills 10th anniversary symposium. The Helen Wills Institute is a neuroscience institute with affiliated labs on the Berkeley campus. Most of the animal protesters wore bandanas over their faces and carried signs like "vivisection kills" and wrote on the sidewalks phrases like "animals die while demons rejoice." I have come to the conclusion that protesting like this is an unhelpful contribution to on-campus activism as well as a distraction from a fruitful animal-research debate.

Continue reading "Vivisection at Berkeley: Protest all life sciences!" »

July 18, 2006

"The simple answer is he thinks murder's wrong..."

GWB's stem-cell veto threat makes me too frustrated to say anything intelligent. It would mark his first veto EVER, and on a topic that about 70% of Americans support. Asshat.

February 28, 2006

Today's seminar: Irving Weissman on stem cells

Today, Irving Weissman gave the Marian Koshland seminar here at Berkeley. Weissman is the Director of the Institute of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine at Stanford. He was also recently featured in The New York Times (see also here). The title of his talk was "Stem cells: Units of regeneration, units in cancer and units of natural selection." He's a pioneer in the science of stem cells (having isolated and characterized the differentiation of the blood-forming cells); he also gives an awesome talk.

He started with an introduction to stem cells, then discussed how stem cells have been implicated in acute myeloid leukemias. His aim is to understand why 2-3% of tumor cells have properties similar to self-regenerating stem cells, and from all appearances, he is making progress. By regulating the expression profiles of hematopoeitic stem- and progenitor-cells, his lab is able to precisely control and induce cancers in a controlled way, including regulating the proliferation of monocytes from chronic myelomonocytic leukemia to acute myeloid leukemia (I hope I got that right!). This is a nice system because they can change exactly which expression program the cell is running at any given time, and observe the results in mice. It might not lead to immediate cures for cancer, but it will certainly help pinpoint how cells become neoplastic (cancerous), step-by-step. This could eventually lead to prophylactic treatments to destroy cells that are pre-cancerous.

But the highlight of his talk was his work on human neural stem cells. He injected human neural stem cells into mice, and they began to behave in certain ways just like mouse brain cells. They responded "correctly" to their microenvironment, differentiating into the proper cell forms and moving about in the mouse brain just as the mouse cells would have. These stem cells displayed plasticity and could repair spinal cord injuries. This is huge. It's easy to see that with some work, obtaining and culturing human neural stem cells could yield fantastic advances for victims of spinal cord injuries(†).

Lastly, Weissman discussed a new model species—the protochordate Botryllus schlosseri—in which the somatic stem cells were under natural selection separately from the germline. He found a receptor in this species that may turn out to be an analog to a natural receptor for NK cells in vertebrates; he speculated that this putative NK receptor could help explain why transplant rejection occurs in some patients despite apparently good matches for the traditional cell surface antigens.

Stay tuned, there is still so much to be learned about human physiology at the cell level. We are just at the very beginning.

(†) Weissman repeatedly noted that President Bush would call these experiments "abominations" because he is creating, after all, "human-animal hybrids." He was quick to point out that an individual's personal ethics could not possibly justify preventing research into life-saving treatments for others.

February 2, 2006

Are cancers broken stem cells?

Are cancers broken stem cells? I've been on a tear with cancer, I know, but I had to share a recent article. In last month's Journal of Investigative Dermatology, researchers at Duke University Medical Center published a paper in which they proposed that melanoma cancers may just be stem cells "stuck" in the wrong mode. Pretty interesting idea, as it ties a lot of loose ends that have been floating around in therapeutic biology.

Of course the big difference between plain ol' somatic cells and stem cells is that most somatic cells are in stationary mode. That means that, unlike stem cells, most of your body's cells are just sitting there, operating just above equilibrium but most importantly, not dividing (†). Stem cells possess the ability to continually divide as well as commit their daughter cells into particular "modes." Because they are constantly dividing, it's not too far of a stretch to imagine that the cells in a tumor (which are also continually dividing) may be running a "corrupted program" of what stem cells normally run.

If true, this would argue that molecular/developmental biology approaches might be better suited to pinpoint the errant cell processes. We know cells run complicated metabolic/gene expression programs, and we've had some successes in differentiating and even de-differentiating stem cells. So if we were to approach cancer like we do with the development and differentiation of stem cells—a field in which we've made some progress—then maybe we could get a better handle on cancer. Maybe even program tumors to stop proliferating by exposing them to the right cocktail of proteins or small-molecule drugs.

With science, the correct model is everything. When we get it, all the previous work starts to make sense and things just work. Is the model of cancer as a miswired stem cell the right model? There are some morphological similarities and functional similarities. We'll have to wait and see...

(†) This distinction is critical and is why chemotherapy works. Since chemo attacks dividing cells, it preferentially affects the tumor. It's also why chemo sucks: you're weak, your immune system sucks and your hair falls out... unlike most somatic cells, hematopoietic (blood-generating) and hair-follicle progenitor cells constantly divide and are also affected by the chemotherapy.