PG&E ClimateSmart program... the right answer?
About a week ago, I received an envelope from PG&E with an image of a little boy walking through a field. The front of the envelope said:
On behalf of Ryan, age 1 and three quarters, we thank you in advance.
I knew right away that it was a conservation effort, so rather than tossing it in with the junk mail, I set it aside to read later. I finally opened it and read about the "ClimateSmart" program, which offered:
For about $5 a month, you can make the energy that you use "climate neutral" by investing in environmental projects that absorb or reduce greenhouse gases.
I was a bit skeptical because of the constant use of scare quotes every time the phrase "climate neutral" was used in the mailer. Turns out, this program is not exactly like green tags, or carbon offsets. As I read at Grist, the ClimateSmart program is not at all a way of purchasing renewable power, and doesn't support programs to create, support or expand renewable power. If you are considering joining the PG&E ClimateSmart program, do read these two posts at Grist:
Comments
ClimateSmart or ClimateCopOut?
PG&E’s own report admits that after 3 years and $17 million dollars of PR, PG&E plans “to enroll approximately 4 to 5 percent of eligible customers into the program.” That leaves 95% of the impact completely untouched.
PG&E’s ClimateSmart plan tells customers that if they care about the climate, they should pay to offset the company’s emissions. PG&E knows that by shifting the responsibility on to the consumers, the overwhelming majority of it’s impact (95%) will never be addressed. This is a common corporate strategy for keeping the public from demanding corporate accountability. Welcome to greenwashing.
On top of the danger of shifting climate responsibility away from energy companies and government and towards the millions of individual consumers, there is the simple fact that offsetting is not an acceptable strategy for the company determining the type of energy being used by 14 million Californians. PG&E’s primary area of impact, and therefore responsibility, is on the type of electricity it provides. And advertising offsets is no compensation for its claim that nuclear is an environmentally-friendly choice nor of its use of 0% solar. We can do better. And we have a clear choice that PG&E is trying to prevent you from demanding. Community Choice Aggregation can get us to 51% renewable energy in ten years. www.CommunityChoiceEnergy.org.
“ClimateSmart”? We think it's more like ClimateCopout. What do you think?
- Green Guerrillas Against Greenwash
www.LetsGreenWashThisCity.org
Posted by: aliza wasserman | March 23, 2008 10:12 PM
Read those two Grist posts carefully: Mr. Romm cites a study that raises questions about the net warming effect of planting trees at high latitudes - which leads Mr. Romm to conclude that trees should never be used for offsets.
We don't support any reforestation projects in California. But we do support reforestation projects in Louisiana and Nicaragua. Check them out.
Russell
Carbonfund.org
Posted by: Russell | March 25, 2008 8:07 AM
No one can succeed without any hard work. Karl Max was successful, because he spent more than 30 years writing the book "Communist Manifesto"; Tomas Edison succeeded, because he had experimented thousands of times to find the best material for lights. Every success calls for hard work. If you want to suc-ceed, work hard first.
Posted by: DC Hats | September 4, 2011 11:44 PM
Thank you for this great post! It has been extremely insightful. I hope that you will continue posting your wisdom with us.
Posted by: Wholesale Jerseys | September 14, 2011 5:29 AM
I always feel I only for beauty, car, money with interest, to the Internet I found more interest, such as your fresh things, ha ha, are you happy? Would be happy to continue refueling, looking forward to your new post
Posted by: North Face Outlet | November 8, 2011 4:42 PM
NBA is shut down, it was not fun, forum and blog as I spend time place, there is so much fun, all have names and no name of visitors, can participate in, as the party
Posted by: North Face Discount | November 8, 2011 4:43 PM
Hello!I am glad to here, Good Site! Thanks you!
Posted by: Cheap NHL jerseys | November 13, 2011 6:42 PM
Wow, nice post,there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post.Thank you for sharing to us.Please one more post about that..
Posted by: uggs outlet | December 20, 2011 9:53 PM
This is very good information.Your writing is very good, I like it very much, I will continue to focus on your oh blog. thank you
Posted by: casque dr dre | December 25, 2011 10:10 PM
I’ve been looking and I have the same idea of the article, and then I found here. Of course, I have several such loving friends, and your desired sound, breaking the law, things are easier to make my benefit, thank you.
Posted by: christian louboutin outlet | December 25, 2011 10:12 PM
I just came here by the current wave, I like it here, including friends and articles. People think this post is very interesting, is also valuable, thank you for sharing, everyone enjoy the fun!
Posted by: coach factory outlet online | December 25, 2011 10:13 PM
Physical anthropologist Erik Trinkaus believes he has found evidence that the exercise of shoes started in the time span between come seal 40,000 and 26,000 years ago, according to the sighting that the thickness of the bones of the toes
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Sale | January 5, 2012 12:04 AM
Its very nice articles,It Was Very useful for me.Thanks for sharing the information with us such.I promise more peoples are also like to!
Posted by: supra high tops | January 9, 2012 1:18 AM
These kind of post are always inspiring and I like it very much,I hope to read more about articles from you.
Posted by: supra skytop | January 9, 2012 1:19 AM
It's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource,
Posted by: cheap north face jackets | January 11, 2012 4:48 PM